The results of the course 'T+S'

The Transistor group

Comments:
• The simulator is good.
• The instruction is good.
• The exercises are minimal (but a good selection)
• 7.5 points.

Najet Smeda & Amal Rhema (Lybie)
Paper about parallelism: a good paper; 8 points.
Paper about simulation: a good paper; 8+ points.

The Biology group

First comments:
• The simulator is good.
• The instruction is good.
• The exercises are minimal (but are good)
• The extra applet is nice and a good idea.
• 8 points.

Wouter Ton:
Paper about simulation: good; 8.5 points


The Axon DVR group

Comments:
• The simulator is good.
• The instruction is very good scientifical checked and good.
• The exercises are also very good and good checked.
• 8+ points.

xxxxx:
Paper of xxx: xxx paper; xxx points


The Axon II group

Comments:
• The simulator is xxx.
• The instruction is xxx.
• The exercises are xxx (but are xxx)
• xx points.

Paper of xxx: xxx paper. I xxx this. xxx points

The Axon HM group

Comments:
• The simulator version 1 is good; also version 2;
• The instruction is nice;
• The exercises are (very) good;
• 8- points.

Miss Mohammed Hasibah
Paper of xxx: xxx paper. I xxx this. xxx points

The RC-Filter group

Comments:
• The two simulators are very good designed.
• The instruction is xxx.
• The exercises are xxx (but are xxx)
• xx points.

Eduard Mollenkamp & Silvia Roukens
Paper of xxx: xxx paper. I xxx this. xxx points
Paper of xxx: xxx paper. I xxx this. xxx points

The Boiler group

Comments:
• xx points.

Li Cheng & Yinjuan Shao (Peggy)
Paper of xxx: xxx paper. I xxx this. xxx points
Paper of xxx: xxx paper. I xxx this. xxx points

The Economy group (M. Pennings)

Comments:
• The simulator is well done (with WebLib).
• The instruction is very good (very complete).
• The exercises are also very good (adequate).
• 8.5 points (--> 9 points in combination with her paper).

Paper of M. Pennings: This is a good paper. 8.5 points

Enschede, March, 8. 2004.